On Feb 22, 2010, at 4:50 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-02-13 05:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
FYI: I agree with Roman. I already removed the 0.42 aliasing feature
from Pd-extended 0.42.5
FYI: i agree with Roman, but i don't think it's a good idea to divert
the behaviours of PdX and Pd in such cases: it will only make
transition
even nastier than it is.
I see no way to support that 0.42 aliasing feature without mountains
of work to achieve poor results. Of course, anyone should feel free
to prove me wrong.
.hc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
