IOhannes m zmoelnig escribió:
no.
it gives the warning with Pd>=0.42 and it doesn't give the error with
older Pd-versions
Ouch, yes, I now realise I may have had different Pd versions (though
not different gem versions) installed on the different machines.
as for worrying: Gem>=0.92 should work fine, even if you get these warnings.
Great.
Just out of curiosity however, what do the warning mean? Well ok, they
mean a class has been overridden, but "why"? The classes mentioned in
the error messages (pix_videoDS for example) don't exist in Pd, so it
seems like they are defined twice in Gem?
I just would like to understand roughly what's going on...
thanks
m.
--
Matteo Sisti Sette
[email protected]
http://www.matteosistisette.com
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
