>a stradivarius isn't made in decade.

neither good violin players...


2010/4/17 <colet.patr...@free.fr>

>
>  In term of DSP processing I've found that Pure Data sound better than max,
>  it sounds like if we remove all the unnecessary electronics from a studio
> mixerboard,
> which is the good point, someone else in the list has already made a
> comparission and C-sound seems to be the most promising.
>
>  But beyond this we haven't got all the stuff proposed for building also
> Music,
>  like music score editors, or internals with the base for building a decent
> and light mixerboard, etc...
>
>  all this stuff doesn't seem so necessary from an engineer point of view,
>  I might be very wrong again, but to go directly to the point,
>  because he knows where to look for in the patch.
>
> The influence of this relationship over the music often have tendances to
> express musical forms
>  where we hear technical limitations.
>
>  I figure it's just a matter of time of developping, a stradivarius isn't
> made in decade.
>
> best
>
> ----- Mail Original -----
> De: "Alexandre Porres" <por...@gmail.com>
> À: "colet patrice" <colet.patr...@free.fr>
> Cc: "pd-list" <pd-list@iem.at>
> Envoyé: Vendredi 16 Avril 2010 20h38:55 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
> Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
> Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
>
>
> > without a good media, we can't get good results
>
>
> Guess my point wasnt clear yet. I'm saying every media has its potential,
> there's no "good" or "bad", anything can be best applied for some purpose,
> even a "shitty" clarinet... it can produce sounds irregularly and with
> spectral content that other clarinets might not...
>
>
> BTW, this is a simple discussion about art and media and not about Pd, it
> is not even a discussion about taste, but I can feel in your arguments that
> you have strong preconceptions... you seem to have a strong fixed idea on
> how things should or must be, about your taste and aesthetics, and I guess
> that is just bad to mix that where it doesn't belong. That's why maybe it's
> so hard to make myself clear...
>
>
> >I don't tell all the world each time I use a pd patch
>
>
> why should you, right? Unless someone asks I guess.
>
> >It's not a problem of 'working' but a problem of 'sounding'.
>
>
> But Damn, it is you who's making the sounds... (!!!) Now this is completely
> vague, and it seems you are missing the point of being objective and is once
> yet again letting subjective aesthetical preconceptions or even something
> else speak up more where it doesn't belong. In order for this discussion not
> to be so pointless, you'd need to point out objectively what the hell you
> are talking about. I guess the thread has also been mislead, are you saying
> MAX or somethng else sounds better by the way?
>
>
> cheers
>
>
> 2010/4/16 < colet.patr...@free.fr >
>
>
>
>
> >Oh, wasn't the metaphor clear, really?
>
> nope
>
>
>
> >well, no problem, here you go then... once more...
>
> there you go
>
>
> >We don't care to know if someone says; "Hey, I got a clarinet", we wanna
> know what he is doing with it, in a sense that it'd make more sense if the
> person would come and say; "Hey, check out, look what I do >with my
> clarinet". The point here is to emphasize the instrument as a tool, a media,
> something that you use to make an idea come true... so the point, in the
> end, is to present this idea. the media should not >be the interesting
> thing, but the result!
>
>
> without a good media, we can't get good results,
> reverbs sounding like bathrooms were cool when Joe Meek used it fifty years
> ago,
> but now the situation is a bit different.
>
>
> >So maybe you need and want a shitty clarinet to achieve the objective you
> have, maybe you need a quite expensive one. Nevertheless, the point is what
> you do with it.
>
>
>
> The clarinetist of one chamber orchestra I've wrote for had to use a 'C'
> clarinette that sounded like shit to play all the notes,
> instead of her cool but expensive B flat, the result is that I don't liked
> the sound she had.
>
> (If you want to compare I can send you the files)
>
>
>
> >As I said, that are things you can only do in Pd... which is basically
> when you need to program something. If you dont see that, maybe you dont
> need it!
>
>
> I use Pd for other purpose than trying to convince people I could make
> music with it, even if I've made several pieces with that it's possible to
> download.
>
>
>
> >And since we need to program it, we are the ones doing the thing, Pd is
> not doing much for us. And yeah, you build stuff with it. So maybe you
> should not waste your time building things that are already there, >why
> reinvent the wheel? If you can do something in Pd, it doesn't mean it has to
> be done in Pd, or that is easier to do it with it.
>
>
> I use the stuff I've built with pd for show numbers, like modern circus,
> and I don't tell all the world each time I use a pd patch.
>
>
>
> >So, anyway, if you build something in Pd that does not work, it is your
> fault, not Pd's... if you built a clarinet in it that does not do what you
> want and need, maybe you should ask a guy who's good at >clarinet
> building...
>
>
> It's not a problem of 'working' but a problem of 'sounding'.
>
>
> >hope it was clearer now, can't make it clearer than that I guess, by the
> way...
>
>
> I do appreciate.
>
> >take care
>
> thank you for your effort in my understanding, but I still remain on the
> idea that pd is just a tool for learning dsp,
> but indeed it can be used for other purposes,
> maybe that is where the discussion has evolved, but
>
> when one knows how dsp works, I guess that person would use real developper
> tools to make his stuff, like a compiler.
>
>
> cheers
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2010/4/15 < colet.patr...@free.fr >
>
>
> I would care about how the clarinette is sounding, if I or a skilled
> clarinetist
> can't make a melody with it, i would play with noises...
>
>
> Selon Alexandre Porres < por...@gmail.com >:
>
>
>
>
> > > pd is just a tool for learning dsp, there is no such project that show
> how
> > > pd is cool to make people moving on the dance floor.
> >
> > Is that what you are really expecting pd to be or sound like? Well,
> indeed,
> > I disagree Pd would be a proper tool for that. And you are really wrong
> to
> > assume pd is only a tool to study DSP, although it is in fact really good
> > for that as well.
> >
> > Now, you are missing completely the points of using Pd, and if you can't
> > imagine why you would need pd to do things that you can only do in pd,
> maybe
> > pd is not for you... no, it ain't a money maker for the dance floor dj...
> >
> > I see musicians and artist that see why they need to do something in pd
> and
> > ask for help. It is common to have an artist creating a piece that uses
> Pd
> > without knowing how to program it, but working in conjunction with a
> > programmer.
> >
> > And of course, Pd can be only a minor (but essential) thing on the
> > project... you don't need to reinvent the wheel in Pd, or just use Pd if
> you
> > are using it... there is no rule for that... in a sense that I don't see
> > there is such a thing called "pd music".
> >
> > > who is the musician, Pierre Schaeffer, or Pierre Henry?
> >
> > I dont see the point here... Of thousands of people who work with
> computer
> > music/technology, do we only have mostly Pierre Schaeffers out there? Is
> > Pierre Henry the Only guy who gets to be a musician? If someone is using
> pd
> > then he can't be Pierre Henry or many other thousands of people I know
> > besides him that are actually great musicians?
> >
> > And yeah, nobody cares if someone comes out and says; "Hey, look what an
> > amazing I have here, I got a Clarinet!!! And I built it... or someone
> who's
> > really good built it for me!!!". All we want to know is, what do you do
> with
> > it, right? And we don't really care about the Clarinet. And if you don't
> > like it, don't blame it on the clarinet...
> >
> > cheers
> >
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to