On 2010-04-22 03:18, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 13:30 +0200, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: >>> A way could be to include help-patches (which are missing right now) >>> and put a comment that read "DEPRECATED" in each of them. >> Absolutely.. Again, it seems just a matter of someone doing the work (tm) > > It's not just that. I wonder if IOhannes is currently getting a > complaint from Hans for editing a file that doesn't belong to him, > without asking > the person's permission ? If not, when will he get a complaint ?
i don't know why you want to depict a scenery with hans sitting there like a bulldog and watching people to not mess around with other's code. it's not like that. however, i guess the main reason why i did not edit those files earlier was that i did not felt responsible for them (read: it is not my code, it belongs to somebody else) i can assure you, that this is an entirely internal business of mine, and has nothing to do with any watchdogs. > who is externals/OSCx/* belonging to, anyway ? iirc, it's belonging to oswald; since he has left Pd a long time ago in favour of SC, i don't think he minds so much if somebody modifies this code (he's probably happy to not be associated too much with unmaintained and buggy code) gsmdft IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
