-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > could depend on iemguts. Then eventually I found out that [propertybang] > can't possibly coexist easily with any external that does the same thing > as it does, so... i'm sort of stuck there, if I'm not supposed to be > relying on [propertybang].
hmm, i don't fully understand that. what is the problem? what do you expect? something like both [propertybang] and [gfpropertybang] both being triggered? fgmsadrt IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkvR87MACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRN2gCg6AHy7qhXV3uqc356riat3eXA 8KwAoLS1E0Le0Nz0dq9tUCNPrQezDpSk =ftKR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
