Ha ha, mine had a hilarious and totally unnecessary extra [list-map]. That's what happens when you work hastily... how embarrassing; oh well.
MB On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Jack <j...@rybn.org> wrote: > True, so now it should be OK (patch attached). > I didn't think of this eventuality. > ++ > > Jack > > > > Le mardi 27 avril 2010 à 20:50 -0400, Matt Barber a écrit : >> One thing to watch out for; if you get two items in the list that are >> equally as far as the test value, mine outputs one list with the value >> replacement at each appropriate index, while Jack's outputs several >> lists with the value replacement at only one index, but each >> replacement sequentially, if that makes any sense. >> >> So if the test value is 2.02, and the input list is <1 0 3 2 4 3 3 2 0 >> 4>, mine will output: >> >> <1 0 3 2.02 4 3 3 2.02 0 4> as one list, while Jack's gives two lists: >> >> <1 0 3 2.02 4 3 3 2 0 4> >> <1 0 3 2 4 3 3 2.02 0 4> >> >> Matt >> >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Jack <j...@rybn.org> wrote: >> > An alternative. Also full pure-pd. >> > ++ >> > >> > Jack >> > >> > >> > >> > Le mardi 27 avril 2010 à 18:49 -0400, Matt Barber a écrit : >> >> Try the attached (threw together using list-abs) -- right inlet is the >> >> value (12 in your example) and left inlet is the list of floats; I >> >> think this follows established list-abs syntax. >> >> >> >> It's possible that I overlooked a list-abs that already does this, and >> >> there is probably a step or two you could skip. >> >> >> >> You might get poor results if the list is a bang or contains symbols. >> >> >> >> Matt >> >> >> >> >> >> > Hello everyone, >> >> > >> >> > I would like to compare all the values in a list with a value of input >> >> > and >> >> > then decide which is the closest value and replace that value closer to >> >> > the >> >> > amount of input. >> >> > >> >> > For example, I have a list <2, 10, 35> and have an input value of <12> I >> >> > would like the list as output <2, 12, 35>. I'm almost getting, but the >> >> > patch >> >> > is so ugly that I will not show here, i'm sure there is a more elegant >> >> > solution. Does anyone have an idea? >> >> > tnx ;) >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- >> >> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> >> > URL: >> >> > <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100427/ac720c09/attachment-0001.htm> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list