I am not an expert in sound but with a [s~] (from [samphold~]) and a [r~] (into [phasor~]), you should avoid dsp loop. [r~] receive with one block delay. Don't know if there is better solution. ++
Jack Le mercredi 28 avril 2010 à 08:03 -0700, Benoît Fortier a écrit : > First time on this mailing list, so hello everyone! I started using pd > a couple of month ago and I'm completely addicted. > > Ok I have a simple problem for which I'm looking for the most elegant > solution. > > I need a phasor (in a looping sampler) which frequency can be changed > only at the beginning of it's period (when it drops to zero). That's > usually the kind of problem a samphold can handle very well but when I > connect a phasor and a samphold directly together I get a "dsp loop > detected (some tilde objects not scheduled)" error. One solution could > be to "pipe" the new frequency to the phasor with a delay calculated > from the previous frequency but I have the feeling there must be a > more elegant solution to this problem. Anyone got a suggestion? > > There is a thread in the archive that is adressing a dsp loop issue > but the solution proposed dosen't seem to be adapted to my specific > problem. > > Thank you > Benef > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
