On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:47 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:15 +0200, tim vets wrote: > > there's a very simple way do do 'sample rate reduction' (which is i > > think the sound you're looking for) > > [readsf~] > > | [phasor~ 100] > > | / > > [samphold~] > > | > > instant lo-fi gratification :) > > This is a crude way to reduce sample rate, but not quite so to reduce > bit depth. > > I say crude, because if the frequency of the phasor~ is not a dividable > whole number of the sampling rate, it will additionally add some jitter > (which even enhances the lofi effect). > > Reduced bit depth (which is what I think 'bit-crushing' means) can be > achieved by dividing the signal by x, pass it through something like > [int~], multiply it by x again. An [int~] can be implemented by using > [wrap~] and [-~], which are both vanilla.
As mentioned in Martin Brinkmann's previous mail and assuming x is a number greater than 1, it would make more sense to multiply first and divide after. Roman _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
