> Meaning, which receive will actually receive the data first? The one that > was first connected? >
Althougth that is true for local connections, weirdly enough, in non-local connections the last created receive object receives data first. In local connections the problem can be solved using trigger. A solution for non-local ones doesn't occur to me. If there is really no workaround on this: What if a second argument would define the order? (e.g.: [r bala 1], [r bala 2] ... ) alabala -- ypatios
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
