On Mon, 10 May 2010, Martin Peach wrote:
So I probably need to use an source image that has texture in both
dimensions, as with vertical bars it does nothing obvious.
It depends which axis you do the [# -] on...
BTW instead of [pack f f] with [t b a] you can do [#pack] without [t b a]
if what you need in the end is a grid of ints. But if you really need the
"120 160" init, then there is no shortcut for that.
This concept of applying A then B then "undoing" the A, is very useful and
I often put things between [# *] [# /] pairs, [# <<] [# >>] pairs, [# c2p]
[# p2c] pairs, with same arguments.
for anything non-commutative, where [a then b] is not the same as [b then a].
Yes. I'd like to note that with limited precision, the amount of
commutativity can be quite limited : [a then b] minus [b then a] will
leave a small trail of residue. Thus I use [# *] [# /] that algebraïcally
may look useless, if I forget that I don't work with real numbers or an
extension thereof, but with ints, it clearly makes a big difference
because of the rounding. (float rounding, however, is usually much more
subtle than that, and [# *] [# /] is rarely useful to deal with it.)
I attached my hacked-up version of your patches.
fun :)
I often do such mashups. It's an easy way to produce more interesting
results using previous interesting results.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
