On Fri, 14 May 2010, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
you would only need [pix_crop]->[pix_movement] without the
[pix_separator] (since the crop will have to allocate a new image
anyhow), thus no need for the extra copying of data.
But I'm taking into account the possibility of chaining several
[pix_motion_sector], which would generally need access to the same
original picture.
I don't know how image allocation works in GEM. Which objects allocate a
new picture, and what does that mean in terms of getting access back to
the original picture, with or without [pix_separator] ?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
