I agree with your view, firstly let me say that my english is a bit awful (as you can see in the previous response to this thread).
>Now, I suppose you can imagine too a politically-defined concept of "glue code"...? No way, that's the issue with "scripting" too. Its just definitions that get caught up in "trends". There's a perfect portuguese idiomatic expression for that, that would loosely translate into "mouth-to-motuh definitions" - whereas a concept gets standardized without any fomal foundations or efforts but because of heavy community use - mark that the tone of my response was not encouraging segmentation core/script/whatever but the opposite, if there should be a separation it should be clearly defined. As for pseudo-code, when in first years of college that really striked me. The definition of it was supposed to strive for a language-free syntax, but it always looked C to me - so I guess that's true for your argument as "political bargain". The article I quote was not showing a correct view but more like "where does this "trend" comes from"... (and by trend I mean the segmentation/naive classification of scripting langs vs. others). >LISP is a traditional language that is interpreted, yet became quite compiled as an option. It's quite Of course, I use compiled LISP on a regular basis :) its nice nice to share some feelings/opinions on this subject, I strongly feel that it has become a "buzz" word, rather than something people have strongly defined - as you can see from the two examples [1][2] it is strongly bounded to the differentiation between compiled and interpreted which in some cases exist in two languages - thus not making a good enough point for classifiying something as a script. >Nowadays I have trouble reading it because it makes me want to rewrite the article. :) >but OF COURSE when you're scripting your programming... :) This means my english is in fact hideous. I was saying (and thinking): "When you are scripting you are programming, and vice versa" - so where's the line separating scripting/programming languages? Is there any need for a line? Do we gain to have such differentiation? Define them... and so on. p.s.: thanks for opening the thread, it was hijacking the previous. And keep them coming I just want to learn. -- Pedro Lopes contacto: [email protected] website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
