>turning that into an external is maybe not efficient - it would better to add these features to the >already existing array object. I meant, altering the existing array into a new bounded_array object, or whatever name suits better. The difference is it would be a compiled object and not an abstraction.
best regards, Pedro On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, João Pais <[email protected]> wrote: > I've written a version of an array with step values and limits, using data >>> >> structures. I could send it to >the list, but I would need some time to >> isolate the code from the main patch. >> That would be interesting João! Another possibility is turning that into a >> direct external, that does the work internally. (I'm assuming you did an >> abstraction... "because you said isolate it from the main patch" - if not, >> even better!) >> > > turning that into an external is maybe not efficient - it would better to > add these features to the already existing array object. > > yes, it would be an abstraction. it isn't in my patch, but can easily turn > into one. I'm very busy now, if I find the time I'll make an abstraction out > of it. > -- Pedro Lopes contacto: [email protected] website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
