i frankly bever understood these names clashing conflicts,
leading us to weird situations,
when you don't even know what you're reallly using
and who to complain to...
wouldn't speaking before
wouldn't be a better solution?
well ...
sevy
patko wrote:
hmmm, in fact you are completely right, I wouldn't like that someone overwrite
my objects,
at least without a discussion about it.
I don't know how this happen in "pd-community", i'm not really a "coder",
but just a "user" that have sometimes to put the fingers in the code when there
is something wrong,
or something not understood; pd is a door opened to the marvellous world of C
and DSP.
I also wouldn't like that this door closes as the code becomes more and more
cryptic,
or unreadable, because of the use of too much elaborated or just undocumented
code,
unless someone explains it, as fully as possible.
Seriously, pd is far from being a professional tool, it's educational, always
the same discussion...
Sayōnara,
patko.
----- [email protected] a écrit :
true,
only someone wanting to take over
should override some basic pd objects no?
Because some pd basic objects doesn't work very good.
We often experience this.
and so what? because your objects work better?
lol, me! never... I just a complainer.
it's just not civilized to overwrite any other's object in my
opinion
then you'll understand what is social engineering
and respecting people in a community right?
ciao,
sevy
to me, the pd commuity has become as a rat race since 3 years at
least,
when it was said it could replace MAX, but for 'free'
not freedom of thought note...
well exactly and become a competitive professional tool,
it's just loosing all the spirit of open source here...
ciao,
sevy
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
