On Jun 14, 2010, at 6:53 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Loic KESSOUS wrote:
I did a few contributions, but not as much as I should have done :)
I (and two other Montréalais) convinced some other French people to
not touch pdpedia and just move on to something worth the time. Here
are some links to some elaborate mails about it on the pdmtl list :
http://lists.artengine.ca/pipermail/pdmtl/2010-April/001647.html
http://lists.artengine.ca/pipermail/pdmtl/2010-April/001648.html
http://lists.artengine.ca/pipermail/pdmtl/2010-April/001649.html
http://lists.artengine.ca/pipermail/pdmtl/2010-April/001653.html
So where is that thing that is better than pdpedia that you guys all
worked on instead?
.hc
pdpedia is for me the closest thing to an object reference
documentation.
you need to revise your criteria for what constitutes an object
reference documentation and/or what is the meaning of "closest thing".
pdpedia need to be updated, some stuff is missing,
so much stuff is missing that you may as well say that the whole
pdpedia is missing.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone:
+1.514.383.3801_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out
how to use my telephone." --Bjarne Stroustrup (creator of C++)
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
