On 2010-06-29 14:46, Bernardo Barros wrote: > 2010/6/29 Frank Barknecht <[email protected]>: >> In this view, Miller has the biggest balls of dem all. :) > > Is there a legal reason for PD not be GPL?
is there a need for a legal (as opposed to other) reason? maybe there are people, who simply find GPL too restrictive (in terms of freedom). > Maybe it has some code from > another project? maybe another project that is fundamentally incompatible with GPL has some code of Pd in it. mfgadfrt IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
