Better and faster with a [drip] and [spigot]s ! :) Inteads of : [t l l] | \ [list length] | \ [until] \ | \ [list append] | / [list split 2] | [unpack f f] ++
Jack Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 19:16 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : > ok. > could you try to remove the gemhead, and check that the slow part is Gem, not > MSD? > > do you use the double gemhead technics, or the repeat technic? > c > > > Le 08/07/2010 18:50, Jack a écrit : > > Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 17:03 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : > >> could you try to create the mobil masses, then the fixed masses, and use a > >> list split 10000? > > OK, done. > > In fact, with 10000 mobiles masses and 10000 fixed masses, if i want > > position of the mobiles masses, i need to use a list split with > > 10000*2=20000 (for X and Y). > > > > So i have something like this : > > [MSD2D] > > | > > [route massesPosL] > > | > > [list split 20000] > > | > > [t l l] > > | \ > > [list length] > > | \ > > [until] \ > > | \ > > [list append] > > | / > > [list split 2] > > | > > [unpack f f] > > | > > etc. with gemhead > > > > Maybe i miss something, but even with a structure with 2500 mobiles > > masses, this is slow. > > Thanx for your help. > > ++ > > > > Jack > > > > > >> > >> couls you check what is the slow part of your patch : > >> i bet msd use about 10% cpu, everything else is used by the use of the > >> data. > >> c > >> > >> > >> Le 08/07/2010 14:53, Jack a écrit : > >>> Hmm, in fact, this system is as slow as PMPD (even more !) even using > >>> [get massesPos mamasse(. > >>> The problem could come that i have 10000 times : mobile mass<-> link > >>> <-> immovable mass ? Is it preferable to have this system managed by > >>> PMPD instead of MSD ? > >>> ++ > >>> > >>> Jack > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 13:31 +0200, Jack a écrit : > >>>> Super ! It is working fine with [massesPosL(, a [until], a [list split > >>>> 4] and a [unpack f f]. > >>>> Thanx a lot ! > >>>> ++ > >>>> > >>>> Jack > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 13:24 +0200, Jack a écrit : > >>>>> Hello Cyrille, > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for your answer. > >>>>> My system has 10000 mobiles masses, 10000 immovables masses and 10000 > >>>>> links. > >>>>> I tried with [massesPosL( message. But the problem is i got the position > >>>>> of the immovables masses. Maybe i can start to create the 10000 > >>>>> immovables masses, then the 10000 mobiles masses and split the list at > >>>>> 10000 (the list is obtained with [massesPosL(). > >>>>> Or i can split 4 elements then split 2 elements. > >>>>> I will try... > >>>>> ++ > >>>>> > >>>>> Jack > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Le jeudi 08 juillet 2010 à 09:46 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit : > >>>>>> did the massesPosL message could help you? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> otherwise, you have the solution to use frank trick : > >>>>>> use the output of the get message to write in a table, and then read > >>>>>> the table... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> c > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Le 08/07/2010 02:13, Jack a écrit : > >>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I have a problem with MSD (exactly [MSD2D]). When i send [bang, get > >>>>>>> massesPos mamasse( to [MSD2D], the output order of the positions of > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>> masses is not the same that the one which was given during the > >>>>>>> creation. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm not sure to be clear, so it is better to see an example ;) (see > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>> attach patch) : > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If i create 3 masses in this order : [mass mamasse 1 100 0 1(, [mass > >>>>>>> mamasse 1 100 2 3( and [mass mamasse 1 100 4 5(. > >>>>>>> Then if i send [bang, get massesPos mamasse(, i can get from the first > >>>>>>> outlet of [MSD2D] : > >>>>>>> [massesPosId mamasse 2 3( > >>>>>>> [massesPosId mamasse 0 1( > >>>>>>> [massesPosId mamasse 4 5( > >>>>>>> Or > >>>>>>> [massesPosId mamasse 4 5( > >>>>>>> [massesPosId mamasse 2 3( > >>>>>>> [massesPosId mamasse 0 1( > >>>>>>> Or > >>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This is not really easy for me because i need to conserve this order > >>>>>>> :/ > >>>>>>> It would be better to always get : > >>>>>>> [massesPosId mamasse 0 1( > >>>>>>> [massesPosId mamasse 2 3( > >>>>>>> [massesPosId mamasse 4 5( > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is there a solution with MSD ? > >>>>>>> With PMPD and dynamic patching, i have no problem, but it is too slow. > >>>>>>> Number of mass> 10000. > >>>>>>> ++ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jack > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> [email protected] mailing list > >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > >>>>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> [email protected] mailing list > >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > >>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> [email protected] mailing list > >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > >>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> [email protected] mailing list > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
