I also run across another thread http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg37440.html which states that [mtx_mul~] has been deprecated. Yet, deprecated objects are needed to be able to instantiate their replacements. What gives?
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Michal Seta <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmmm... I run across this thread when searching for information about > [mtx_*~]. If I load iemmatrix and I instantiate [matrix~] it tells me > that it is deprecated and please replace by [mtx_*~]. Which is fine > until I save, quit Pd and reopen the patch after which [mtx_*~] is no > longer available until I again instantiate the deprecated [matrix~] > again. Following the advice given in this thread I created a > [mtx_mul~] and it seems to behave the same as [mtx_*~]. Yet, [mtx_*~] > alone is impossible to use. The rationale of this feature escapes me. > > Is it safe to use [mtx_mul~] (i.e. it will not become deprecated > sometime in the foreseeable future in favour of its * brother)? > > Thanks > > ./MiS > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:20 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]> wrote: >> Max wrote: >>> where is [mtx_*]? >> >> it's in iemmatrix. >> >>> >>> i've loaded iemmatrix and iem_matrix >> >> try instantiating [mtx_mul]. >> afterwards you might be able to use [mtx_*] directly. >> >> gfmadr >> IOhannes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
