On 2010-09-29 19:24, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Max wrote: > >> why complicated metadata if you can already do [inlet~ channel1] and >> [outlet activity] in an abstraction/subpatch? afaik arguments to those >> objects currently are ignored, but i do use them sometimes to make me >> remember their function. > > $1 $2 and $3 of [inlet~] and [outlet~] are already reserved for the > resampling feature (specific to DSP). This feature was introduced a few > years after the inlet-tooltip feature was introduced. >
quite interesting remark. i cannot remember exactly when the inlet-tooltio feature was introduced (i only remember that one implementation was done during the coding sprint at PdCon04; however i think that günter had an earlier implemenation lying around...ah searching the archives i find that günter has done an implementation in 2003: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2003-11/001797.html) the up/downsampling feature, that - according to you email was introduced a "few years after the inlet-tooltip", has been in Pd since 0.35.0 (the tar archive of which has time-stamps around 2002-07) fgamsdr IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
