On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
iirc, the reason for obsoleting [namecanvas] is that it allows the
dynamic patching engine to get into an inconsistent (probably crashing)
state (true, there are other things that allow this as well, without
getting obsoleted).
Especially, you can crash pd using the thing that is supposed to be
replacing namecanvas, using a total of 3 objects. So, the reason for
obsoleting [namecanvas] is bogus. Here's an attachment for demonstrating
that.
anyhow, [namecanvas] has no concept of "this" either.
What's a concept of "this", to you ? It seems that we don't agree on
this... we're not using the same vocabulary.
_______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------ Villeray, Montréal, QC
#N canvas 595 0 450 300 10;
#N canvas 0 0 450 300 crap 1;
#X obj 134 90 s pd-crap;
#X msg 134 64 clear;
#X connect 1 0 0 0;
#X restore 82 89 pd crap;
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list