A better model for the libs would be just to have packages, spreading the effort between people to maintain each package. And leaving space to develop the pd-core/pd-gut themselves. Don't you think? Maybe I'm missing something.
I didn't know about the incompatibility of BSD and GPL. This happens with all versions of BSD? Mathieu, maybe we need a new project called PureFlow? :-) 2010/10/1 Mathieu Bouchard <[email protected]>: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Pedro Lopes wrote: > >> Then its all about reconnecting pd with these "more friendly GUI >> features". Even if they don't make it to vanilla, why not extended? > > pd-extended is only for the things Hans wants, and if it's not something > that is expected to go in vanilla, it better be damn important, to justify > maintaining a long-term difference between extended and vanilla. > > I've heard Hans say that he can't use DesireData code because it's licensed > under the GPL. Pd-extended is also said to be licensed under the GPL, but > the pd core section of it comes with Miller's BSD notice, and any > contributions to vanilla need to be under the BSD. However, in all those > years, Hans never asked me whether relicensing any piece of it would be a > possibility, so I think that the license issue is just a façade for another > issue. > > _______________________________________________________________________ > | Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------ Villeray, Montréal, QC > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
