Hans, so your proposal is to split the current pdpcap in 2 different objects: one for live (net device) capturing and a second one for pcap file reading?
I like Mathieu's suggested name:1) the Mathieu's reasoning about naming, 2)the objects I think is differentiated of pdp, 3)doesn't lost enterely his original name pd-pcap, On 1 October 2010 14:20, Mathieu Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Jordi Sala wrote: > > Yes it can be renamed, I named pdpcap when I started the object >> (PD+PCAPlib)...,... pcap could be a good name....any suggestions? >> > > name the package "pd-pcap" and the pd library file "pcap.pd_linux" for > example. > > Several programming languages use such naming... the hyphen makes it like a > namespace in the package-manager, and the complete lack of the "pd-" prefix > in the context of pd makes it look like you're loading the original "pcap" > itself into Pd (which, of course, makes a lot more sense if that's exactly > what your lib does : a plain wrapper and nothing else). I think that this is > the kind of naming that users of several other programming languages have > come to expect (Perl, Python, Tcl, Ruby, PHP, etc.) > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > | Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------ Villeray, Montréal, QC > -- Jordi Sala http://musa.poperbu.net
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
