ola,
that's exactly the worst possible answer...
do it yourself and the author of pd-extended
will get the credits..
no thank you, pure:dyne seems very honest to me
furthermore i have many other things to do ... so, just not
wasting more time with pd-extended
ciao,
sevy
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:07 +0200, [email protected] wrote:
but obviously the intention is to abandon some libraries
That is certainly not true. You're looking from the wrong perspective.
It's not the case that someone decides _not_ to include certain
libraries, it's more that some people are interested in doing the work
to get certain libraries included. In the case of pdp there is not even
a need for that effort, since it is already included, as IOhannes
pointed out. Also here on my ubuntu 10.04 system:
~$ aptitude show pd-pdp
Package: pd-pdp
Version: 1:0.12.5-1ubuntu1
Feel free to become a member of the pkg-multimedia team in order to push
the packages you want into Debian. I don't think that anyone would
object to having also pidip and unauthorized in the repositories.
( once again and again, unilateral decision
without discussion )
Thanks for starting that discussion now.
Roman
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
