illegal where? Globally? What of fair use? ________________________________________ From: Mathieu Bouchard [ma...@artengine.ca] Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 8:59 AM To: Pagano, Patrick Cc: Hans-Christoph Steiner; ydego...@gmail.com; pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Pagano, Patrick wrote: > So what does this really mean? We have to go back to building pidip from > source if we want to use it? has it changed that much from when it was > released? I am just starting to get students interested in learning > these objects and would like to continue Actually, you don't have the right to use PiDiP, and no-one has the right to. It's illegal, and it's been like that for at least five years. > Why is there this animosity? Because there is a genuine legal problem, and it's been there for at least five years, but for some people, it has somehow become more obvious now, because the Degoyon clause just expanded a lot, though it was already just as illegal in 2005. _______________________________________________________________________ | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list