Or like this ? ;) ++ Jack
Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 11:09 +0100, Nicolas Montgermont a écrit : > something like this? > very arbitrary though, it should be better to receive 0 when the > condition is false. > n > > Le 08/12/10 04:07, Ben Carney a écrit : > > I don't think I am very good at asking pure data related questions. > > > > > > the 1000 milliseconds is an arbitrary number. > > > > > > I am just trying to deduce that a 1 is not being sent or received. > > for any amount of time. > > > > > > so the example I gave was everything that wasn't a 1 in that second > > would be spat out as a zero. > > > > > > is that a bit more clear? > > > > > > I am doing this as I am receiving data from someone else's > > processing sketch that is sending 1s if a certain condition is met. > > However, In this processing sketch there are no zeros being sent if > > this condition is no longer met, so It is up to me to decipher if > > whether or not this condition is true any longer. > > > > > > It confuses me quite a bit too, which is why i came to the list. > > > > > > > > > > hope I am clear here, and thanks a bunch for taking the time to take > > a look at my problem! > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Mathieu Bouchard > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Ben Carney wrote: > > > > lets say I have a metro that sends a bang every one > > second, for the rest of the 999 miliseconds, could I > > somehow deduce a zero message? > > it doesn't need to be that granular(I don't need 999 > > 0s for every 1) > > > > > > Even though the base unit of [metro]'s time is the > > millisecond, it doesn't mean that a millisecond is somehow > > any kind of building block of pd's concept of time. You can > > have fractional delays of your choice, within the limits of > > the float32 format and of the manner of writing it (not too > > many decimals...). > > > > Well, actually, [metro] has an artificial lower limit at > > 1.000000, but if you imitate [metro] using [delay] connected > > to itself, you don't have that limitation. > > > > In the light of this, the question doesn't make much > > practical sense. But suppose you still want it. You have to > > put a [delay 1] so that at the same time you set the "1", > > you set a clock that will set the "0" after 1 ms of time. > > > > Alternately, you can have a [metro 1] connected to a counter > > that loops at 1000. > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, > > Montréal, QC > > > > > > > > -- > > benfcarney > > www.benfcarney.com > > Chicago, IL > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- > http://nim.on.free.fr > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
receiveOnes.pd
Description: application/extension-pd
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
