On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Andrew Faraday wrote:
I've had a bit of a daydream about a further development in PD. Could an expression be placed into the arguments of an object, or even a named receive become part of expr
Written the way you wrote it, that would conflict with the means to access a global variable in [expr]. That's a [v], not a [r].
I suppose the dream would be to have something like [osc~ (pitch * 2)]
That conflicts with the syntax used in GridFlow for nested lists. It would also conflict with the syntax of [expr] itself, I suppose (depends on details).
Does anyone know of anything like this to streamline pd? Or am I just dreaming here?
I like dreaming too, but I need the dreams to be consistent with what's already there and without conflicts.
_______________________________________________________________________ | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
