On Dec 14, 2010, at 10:08 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:20:32AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 16:08 +0100, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-12-14 15:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I believe the objection you mention is that Pd-extended automatically creates ~/pd-externals. ~/pd-externals is the standard user- install
path for Pd-vanilla and Pd-extended.

I would second the suggestion someone made of a .pd-extended (with dot) folder in the user's home as that seems quite standard for many linux
apps... Of course I'm not sure how much this would break existing
libraries which rely on the pd-extended folder.

That's a common suggestion. Frank made a good case for it not to be a .
file, you can see the threads at the bottom here:

http://puredata.info/docs/faq/how-do-i-install-externals-and-help-files

Did you interperet Frank's comment:

The home path isn't important anyway as every user probably has her
own file layout for home. And I don't think that every home should be
standardized, I like it if all my friends' homes look different.

to mean that he doesn't agree with a dot file? I am not sure if that's a correct reading. Seems more like a whimsical off-hand comment than a reason to
break with forty two years of unix tradition.

No, we explicitly discussed the name and leading dot. Don't remember exactly where.

If you don't like ~/.pd-externals the other thing you could do is follow the
free desktop standard and put it in one of ~/.config/pd-externals
~/Templates/pd-externals ~/Documents/pd-externals or something? There must be a
precedent for this.

"pd-extras" would seem like a more apt name to me too.

Sorry to be a trouble maker. I should say that I totally love this new feature
and many thanks for lobbying to get it into Pd/MSP.

We read the Free Desktop standards and didn't find anything relevant. External libraries are not conf files, so .config isn't appropriate. They are not really documents either. If the Free Desktop standards do come up with something that fits, I think it would be a good idea to follow that standard.

.hc



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism. - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom



_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to