> Because the title of the work is « Sonification of IT censorship > technologies » and this title is the public's first contact with the work.
Sonification is the exactly the process I was talking about. > If one can't reasonably hear the censorship in it, is it appropriate to > advertise the work using such a title ? How would you define a 'reasonable listening of censorship'? > Also, if the media you give for documenting the work is a soundfile, and not > a way to witness the process, how can the audience relate to your process > instead of just to your soundfile ? Sure, but in this case soundfile is only for online documentation, the work is exhibited as multichannel audio installation, the audience can interact with the software and read relevant information about the how/what/why. > > _______________________________________________________________________ > | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC -- Marco Donnarumma aka TheSAD Independent New Media Arts Professional, Performer, Teacher Ongoing MSc by Research, University of Edinburgh, UK PORTFOLIO: http://marcodonnarumma.com LAB: http://www.thesaddj.com | http://cntrl.sourceforge.net | http://www.flxer.net EVENT: http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
