@Andras: yours is an accurate observation, thanks for your comments. That principle seems to heavily underpin all on-line censorship systems as it's fostered by the character of virtuality of Internet networks.
It also seems to be a dangerously recursive process, as showed by the "Transparency Report" by Google which is itself censored (ex, they can not show China statistics): http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/governmentrequests/ @Collin: I hope the same. In any case I very much appreciate the fact that a simple work like this can stimulate discussion. Matju observations are moving the conversation onto other interesting insights. M > This is an amazing observation, and it is evidence that it might not be > a good idea to spend too much energy trying to suppress a creative > impulse. Not that suppression was Mattieu's intention, this little gem > may owe it's existence to his criticism! I just hope artists will have > the courage to follow through with their impulses, even though they may > face some unsympathetic criticism. > > Just don't not do it, > > Collin > > > > > On 12/20/2010 04:22 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Maybe the wisdom is exactly that, that a censored world will sound just like >> a non-censored world, and one will not be able to percept that "something is >> missing", which is dangerous if you think about it. Imagine you go home one >> day and some important things of yours have been stolen but you go on >> without noticing their absence, even with the time passing. Scary! >> >> Andras -- Marco Donnarumma aka TheSAD Independent New Media Arts Professional, Performer, Teacher Ongoing MSc by Research, University of Edinburgh, UK PORTFOLIO: http://marcodonnarumma.com LAB: http://www.thesaddj.com | http://cntrl.sourceforge.net | http://www.flxer.net EVENT: http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
