On 10/01/11 12:06, Jaime Oliver wrote: >> the truth is: it depends on the purpose. > > Nothing Truer... > >>> Not defending anything, but just to remind 60 fps of a pointgrey > camera is not slow. >>for gesture, i consider everything under 200Hz as slow. > > surely this is the case for percussion as in your example here: > >> by example, things like this have to be done at 1000Hz: >> http://vimeo.com/9598075 > > However, with a minimum of 75fps with a ps3 camera (you can get up to > 120fps at 320x240...) you can get very responsive results: > www.jaimeoliver.pe/sc2 <http://www.jaimeoliver.pe/sc2> > > It is clear that this project is not as concerned with precise triggers, > it is more concerned with continuous control... > > you just need to find out if what these space&temporal resolutions offer > you what you're looking for. (+ solving less robust lighting, which is > what really determines if video tracking is the way to go...)
It's hard to say if this solution can work for me. Maybe I should just buy a ps3 camera and try out. Do you think that the ps3 camera can correctly track a body moving (using enough lighting)? Best _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
