----- "Jonathan Wilkes" <[email protected]> a écrit : > --- On Wed, 2/2/11, patko <[email protected]> wrote: >
> > no one would be actually ridiculous by generating music > > with brain (Can you say that about chicken dance?). > > I chose the example of the Chicken Dance exactly because it is > ridiculous, so I agree with you, but fail to see the relevance. > This figure of style just make me thinking about homer simpson's brain activity always having a chicken dancing somewhere in the mind... > Also-- what do you mean by point of view? If you mean a visualization > of the activity, I suppose I could also say a dancer can imagine their > own Chicken Dance in kinesthetic terms, quite separate from any > sound or image. > Seriously, music is easier to share with most people than galliformes choregraphy. > > > > Tools have been developped to reproduce this music for > > sharing a projection around a consensus that is different > > following different social groups. We're just trying not to > > be alone. > > What do you mean when you say "this music"? This music that comes first from the mind. > > Also there is not idea *behind* music, music *is* the > > idea. > > It depends on how you define "idea behind music". > > I believe matju means the process that led to music getting produced, > or written, or whatever. In that case the idea is not the music. > The idea that lead someone to produce music could lead anyone to anything else, like chicken dance for example. -- Patrice Colet _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
