On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Bastiaan van den Berg <[email protected]>wrote:
> > If only puredata just used YUV by default internally for _everything_ so at > least it would be a bit faster, and I think a lot more work can be done to > get a better video performance. Maybe someone on the list has a nice list of > semi-universal tips to make video patches run faster? > > GEM on OSX and pdp on any platform do this. > Or maybe for video puredata is just 'almost' fast enough with computers > nowadays.. Can't imagine ever playing with GEM and pix_ stuff on a Pentium 3 > for example. What I mean is, that puredata only recently has become a viable > option for the stuff that you and I want to do with it? > I started doing 1920x1080 HD work using GEM on OSX in 2006 and never had performance problems. I had the engineers who write Final Cut Pro tell me that what I was doing was physically impossible with modern CPUs, yet it was done. At this point streaming raw video out of a 5D or P2 cam, recording it to disk while manipulating the video using shaders is the baseline for performance, not fantasy.
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
