--- On Mon, 3/7/11, Mathieu Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Mathieu Bouchard <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any 
> external?
> To: "Miller Puckette" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, March 7, 2011, 9:07 PM
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Miller Puckette
> wrote:
> 
> > Sorry -- there's no way to do that!
> 
> Yes there is a way to do it, but it takes 5 hours to find
> out how to do it in pd, while it takes 5 minutes to edit the
> C code so that people can do it in pd in 5 seconds. But most
> of all it takes 0.5 second to write "sorry".

matju,
     How long would it take you to implement the "$@" thingy that you 
commented on in the patch tracker?  That would be a big step forward and 
would surely get included in pd-ext and pd-l2ork.

     (I would try my hand at it, but I move at turtle speed in c.)

-Jonathan

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ----
> Villeray, Montréal, QC
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected]
> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 


      

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to