On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I guess you don't work in anything but 44100 sampling rates. I have done
projects that use 22050 and 48k, and both won't work right unless the
sampling rate is set correctly. Therefore its an essential property of the
patch.
But you can often use [samplerate~] in those situations no?
Not necessarily. Even things like [lop~] look like they aren't adapting
well to the samplerate, even though they are computed using samplerate.
However, I haven't dug deep enough to figure out whether it was really a
[lop~] problem, or rather a [vd~]/[tabread4~] problem, or perhaps a
problem with the very concept of sampling (that is, that we shouldn't
expect too much from harmonics that are too close to Nyquist... and that
starts a lot below Nyquist frequency).
_______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
