I agree that this is quite cryptic. I think i've read somewhere that the
functionality that's missing has to do with the plugins.

In Ubuntu's repositories there's only a pretty old version of Ardour
available. I don't know what the deal is...

Pierre

2011/3/18 ailo <[email protected]>

> Personally, I find:
>
> "You can edit the amount in the box below to any amount you wish, If you
> are downloading a ready-to-run version, and choose to pay nothing, you
> will get one that is missing some handy functionality. Continuing
> development, bug fixes and support can only happen if there is money to
> support those activities. Please become one of the many downloaders who
> help support the future of Ardour! "
>
> .. to be a bit cryptic.
>
> So, from my viewpoint it's open for interpretation, until someone proves
> there is in fact a difference between a non-paid and a paid version of a
> download intended for Mac.
> As for Linux, there is no "ready-to-run version" on their site, so I
> would assume that is not a part of the deal anyway.
> Also, the source can be compiled on any system, even mac.
>
> The point of the fact is that the program is still in larger parts GPL
> (the parts written by Ardour), which means it belongs to the public, so
> even one paid download would still become free as soon as the next
> person made it available to be downloaded for free.
>
>
> On 03/18/2011 02:24 PM, Pierre Massat wrote:
> > "You can edit the amount in the box below to *any* amount you wish, If
> you
> > are downloading a ready-to-run version, and choose to pay nothing, you
> will
> > get one that is missing some handy functionality."
> >
> > (from their website, Download page).
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> > 2011/3/18 ailo <[email protected]>
> >
> >> On 03/18/2011 01:39 PM, Pierre Massat wrote:
> >>> They're saying that some functionalities are missing if you don't pay.
> >>
> >> No functionalities are missing to my knowledge. '
> >>
> >> The reason to why there are different licenses is because different
> >> people have contributed, as is usually the case with any big open source
> >> project.
> >> Just look at the Linux kernel. That is a monstrous project, involving
> >> all kinds of licenses.
> >>
> >> To my knowledge, Ardour is not only partly freely available. It's fully
> >> freely available. It is almost purely, a GPL based project, like most
> >> GNU / Linux open source projects.
> >>
> >> If you are interested in investigating the meaning of the licenses, I
> >> suggest you download the full source of Ardour.
> >> Then look up each license for each bit of code to see what they mean.
> >>
> >> --
> >> ailo
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> ailo
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to