On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Billy Stiltner wrote:
Here is the MingW docs for how to do that but the link to reimp
appears to be dead.
http://www.mingw.org/wiki/MSVC_and_MinGW_DLLs
I think that I've read that already, and that I tried to do that, but it
wouldn't handle C++-specific things, such as encoding the argument types
into the symbols, encoding class name into symbols, namespaces,
exceptions, and such.
If you could reverse engineer this it might work. Appears the stack is
reversed and the segments are in diferent chunks.
http://www.mmowned.com/forums/world-of-warcraft/bots-programs/memory-editing/281008-gcc-thiscall-calling-convention-linux-win32-mingw.html
I can't even get the symbols to be found, thus it's not worth trying %ecx
tricks and stuff.
The thing to do is use vc++ to compile to assembly language an export function.
Then get gcc to compile the corresponding import function.
I always expected not to have to install MSVC.
Look at the differences and make some inline assembly code to compensate.
Here is a reference from the gcc vcc+ veiwpoint.
http://wyw.dcweb.cn/stdcall.htm
It's much of the same : even though it says «C++» in the title, it doesn't
say how to deal with C++-specific name mangling such as :
??4imageStruct@@QAEAAU0@ABU0@@Z
and because they contain «?» and «@», they can't be used directly in C++,
and stdcall didn't do the job of mangling them VC++-style, and don't know
how to get gridflow/src/Gem.def's aliases to work.
Hopefully the compiler understood.
I hadn't looked at the code, only at what you had pasted in the email.
I have visited this perplexing search for the 3 dimensional equivalent
of j or i sporadically. Elusive it is.
I'm pretty sure that there are already proofs that the nicest number
systems made using a cartesian product of real numbers, are made with two
or four dimensions, and everything else is weird. I mean, if you expect
that a*(b*c) = (a*b)*c where a,b,c are three vectors, that's quite a
difficult property to satisfy, and if you expect that a*a=0 implies a=0,
it's even harder to satisfy, etc.
You could read those pages in detail (I haven't) :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercomplex_number
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebra_over_a_field
Appologies. You should be able to view it now. I had it set to private
instead of hidden.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZUTn-rie8w
I don't understand any of it, but I can certify that a 5-dimensional cube
has 80 faces. It's in the big table in this article :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercube
... which, incidentally, is a very close variant of Pascal's triangle.
so, where does your video come from ?
_______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
