Le samedi 21 mai 2011 à 12:06 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard a écrit : > On Sat, 21 May 2011, cyrille henry wrote: > > > from my experience, Gem is 2 times faster on the same computer using > > ubuntu than osX. thanks to nvidia profiling tools, Nicolas pointed that > > gem is limited to 50% usage of the GPU. there is certainly a limitation > > somewhere on osX preventing application to use full performance of the > > hardware. so, you applications are slower, but the interface will always > > be smooth... > > There's a setting in Gnome/Ubuntu for choosing no effects, normal effects, > extra effects. This may make a difference. What kind of performance > difference do you get when you change that setting ? It might explain part > of what happens on OSX, perhaps (where, afaik, you don't have such a > setting, and effects level is somewhere between ubuntu's normal and extra > levels). Yep, of course, you have to choose 'no effect' in 'Appearance' to get best frame rate. MacOSX should have this option too. ++
Jack > > _______________________________________________________________________ > | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
