-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2011-06-20 03:04, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> 
>> Under the heading "Add Artifact" please add that a backtrace 
>> would be useful to include in a bug report[1] (rather than 
>> mentioning it casually in a sidenote).


indeed the "Add Artifact" is a bit moody.

nevertheless, i can think of a number of bug reports that do not require
a backtrace at all, and it would seem to be even more weird, to ask
people to submit a backtrace if they only wanted to point out that the
font rendering behaves unseemly and wanted to illustrate that with a
simple screenshot.

usually, "more specific info" is requested from the submitter in a
second step, which i h ave skipped know as here was already direct
communication.

anyhow, it would of cause be great if we could add something more
specific than "file" or "artefact", so submitters would know directly
what they are expected to submit.

famsdr
IOhannes




>>
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>

> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk3+9rsACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTy2gCghXYKc1N1T2c6rWVY7sZ83OtT
TfUAnjvCGF1av7dWO9pg0raP6xDBc7bL
=dfQe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to