On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:36 +0200, "András Murányi" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 00:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I should, there is a specific question of whether these two are still > > needed: > > > > http://puredata.info/docs/**developer/64BitLinux<http://puredata.info/docs/developer/64BitLinux> > > http://puredata.info/docs/**developer/**BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuI** > > ntrepid<http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid> > > > > 0.43 should work fine on all 64-bit systems (never tested Windows tho). > > > > .hc > > > > Well, do these apply to to 0.42 in any way? If not any more, they can go. > However, it could be nice to have a short writeup on the history of > 64-bit > in Pd, most importantly stating the version from which it does not make a > difference any more. > > Andras
That's a good idea. As far as I know, Pd vanilla 0.42.5 was the first version that was fully usable on 64-bit. Pd-extended 0.43 is the first version where the all the libs are expected to run on 64-bit (at least on GNU/Linux, still no Gem on Mac OS X). Here's my quick stab at this page and I don't even have a 64-bit OS. Can the 64-bit people add and edit this to something useful :-D http://puredata.info/docs/64BitSupport .hc _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
