On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
2. I just saw list-drip from pd-extended (I work with vanilla). Is
there any reason, why it is so complicated? I have always used the
attached list-drip, which I made a couple of years ago. Can someone
comment on that? I'm just trying to make sure my object doesn't
screw up in some corner cases... (although it hasn't failed on me
yet ;-)
list-abs used to contain your kind of list-drip, until 2009.
The thing is, your kind of list-drip takes an amount of time proportional
to the square of the number of elements, whereas my kind of list-drip
takes a time proportional to the number of elements.
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-02/068306.html
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-02/068316.html
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-02/068326.html
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-02/068339.html
It's also possible to make a tiny external that runs a lot faster than
that. For example, GF's [foreach] already does.
_______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
