Hmm... I don't have a clear idea of what the scheduling policy or policies should be for incoming and outgoing network traffic. I think I need to figure that out first before starting to tweak netsend/netreceive (and pd~, which could share some code with netsend/receive if I could think things through better.)
cheers Miller On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 12:58:06PM -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: > Speaking of workarounds what is wrong with clock_delay(0) implementation of > disis_ netreceive when it uses existing facilities, has no noticeable > overhead, does not drop packets our crash GUI, and is very easy to implement? > > Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A > Composition, Music Technology > Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio > Director, L2Ork LinuxLaptop Orchestra > Assistant Co-Director, CCTAD > CHCI, CS, and Art (by courtesy) > Virginia Tech > Department of Music > Blacksburg, VA 24061-0240 > (540) 231-6139 > (540) 231-5034 (fax) > disis.music.vt.edu > l2ork.music.vt.edu > ico.bukvic.net > > Jeppi Jeppi <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's exactly what happens, some minutes after clients start sending massive > OSC stuff to my server, its GUI freezes but PD works ok and I can operate > with sliders and number boxes, though I can't see anything. > > Frustrating :) > > > Josep M > > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:04:37 -0400 > > CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [PD] netsend/netreceive + GUI bug > > > > > > On Aug 7, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, Miller Puckette wrote: > > > > > >> Here's a guess... if incoming (vanilla) netreceive traffic is > > >> swamping Pd, > > >> then since Pd prioritizes input from GUI above output back to GUI, > > >> the > > >> output never gets scheduled. If that were happening, you'd see the > > >> windows > > >> freeze but still be able to send Pd events from the GUI (hitting > > >> buttons in > > >> the patch, for instance.) > > > > > > That sounds like the same symptom as when there is an extra unquoted > > > open-brace. > > > > > > What would it take to convince you to port your DD escaping code to Pd > > 0.43? :-D :-D :-D > > > > .hc > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a more > > direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in practice, > > it can change entire economies. - Amy Smith > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
