Okay i will join the gem-dev list when I'll get time to work on it... before I'd like to finish the pd-extended build system stuff, there still are problems to get it working.
Using mingw would be great for me because we will be able to use Gem libs on gridflow. ----- "IOhannes zmölnig" <[email protected]> a écrit : > On 08/28/2011 05:54 PM, Patrice Colet wrote: > > hello IOhannes, > > > > is gem 0.93 compiled with mingw, if not, is it planned? > > it's not compiled with mingw, and it is not planned for 0.93 > > Gem currently does not compile with mingw (see recent postings on > gem-dev@), but it would be a nice feature to have for 0.94 (help > would > be appreciated; hint, hint :-)) > > apart from mingw currently not properly compiling Gem at all, there > are > some more things that ought be kept in mind: > - i (personally) currently don't have time nor energy to setup a > local > mingw build machine for Gem > - for video capture and image acquisition Gem uses DirectShow and i > remember that there were problems using those with mingw > - all the DirectShow stuff is no longer part of Gem proper, but lives > in > plugins (cool); unfortunately the plugins (still only) have a C++ > API, > so you couldn't use a plugin compiled with M$VC within Gem compiled > on > mingw. > > so having Gem build on MinGW would be great, but it is not very high > on > my todo list (but again, if you feel like doing the work, go ahead; > in > this case, it might be a good idea to join gem-dev@) > > fgmasdr > IOhannes -- Patrice Colet _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
