On OSX you should make the shm settings much larger. OSX still has the original values (~4MB) from the original mid-80s NextStep.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:25 AM, cyrille henry <[email protected]> wrote: > hello, > > you can use multiple pd instance, or use pd~ objects. > This 2 solution aimed to have 2 (or more) pd running. > the 2nd solution is great since all pd instance are synchronized at audio > rate. > The 1st is better if some instances can slow down, so that it did not slow > the others. > > The main bottleneck is the communication between this process. > for audio communication, prefer pd~ solution. > for huge data communication, i don't find both approach very good. > for image communication, i successfully use pix_share_read and > pix_share_write object (for both solution). > > cheers > Cyrille > > Le 30/08/2011 11:11, Jean-Marie Adrien a écrit : > > Hello list >> Im pushing a Mac quite a lot with image analysis + audio and id like to >> know if there is a simple way to use efficiently the multiprocessors. >> Ive read through a recent paper by Miller concerning multiprocessing, but >> is there somewhere a manual :) ? Something practical for a basic user ? >> Would running two instances of PD (one processing image and the other >> sound, with some internal bus link) be a good trick ? >> Anyone gone along this way ? >> Thanks >> JM >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** >> listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list> >> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/** > listinfo/pd-list <http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list> >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
