2011/8/31 Michael Zacherl. <[email protected]>

> Hi, I'm currently experimenting with dynamic patching, sending mgs to cnvs
> etc.
>
> One obvious question is, how to address a dynamic abstraction when having
> multiple instances of it in a main patch.
> Is there a way around this?
> Besides that any msg to the cnv hits all occurrences of that particular
> abstraction I manage to crash pd almost regularly with 0.42.6, ext-0.42.5
> and 0.43.0.
> 0.43.0 also shows an Tcl-error message, probably regarding the line which
> sticks out when running that example on 0.42.6 and ext-0.42.5.
> (this cord also shows up when using just one instance of this abstraction).
>
> I included a simple example.
> Any hints?
>
> Thanks a lot, Michael.
>
>
> Use a sub-patch inside your abstraction named [pd $1], and send the msg
stuff to [s pd-$1]?
that cord sticking out is wierd indeed, I have had a similar issue with
tables showing up outside the bounds of a GOP...
gr,
Tim

>
>
>
> --
> keep your ears open: http://blauwurf.at
> http://soundcloud.com/noiseconformist
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to