2011/9/4 Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca>

> On Sun, 4 Sep 2011, András Murányi wrote:
>
>  Hold on... When Matju talks about how DD works it's *almost* like
>> backporting from DD to Pd, and in this sense it's historic. And because of
>> the incompatible licenses, it might be the only way to port from DD to Pd.
>> Pst...! :O)
>>
>
> So, what are the licenses of DesireData ?
>
> It's not like you really looked.
>

It's similar: I remembered. See the whole thread:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2010-10/083326.html
So, my point was: instead of arriving once every year to this point of "oh
it's not compatible licenses / oh they are / oh noone asked me / etc) and
then going no further, it is actually pretty cool that you tell how things
are in DD and why, and someone who understands it might go and code it up.
This way any *possible* license incompatibilities, many *possible* bugs, and
*possible* virii/malware are filtered out. The last one was a joke.

Andras


> The server-side changes are under the same BSD license as Pd.
>
> And no-one ever asked me for any license-change of any part of the
> client-side. It's not like anyone ever tried.
>
>
>  ______________________________**______________________________**
> ___________
> | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
>
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to