On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo wrote: > The reason why I didn't make an abstraction for the "debyte" is that I > wanted to keep the number of files and dependencies as low as possible. I > think this was the original idea of the rewrite, right?
Yeah, exactly. I would like to be able to install [arduino] also on a plain Pd-vanilla setup with the least amount of additional effort. [comport] will always be needed, of course. > > Anyway what can be done is add a simple offset number like I did it > somewhere on my testing patch. Then you can copy as many instances as needed > and offset them. Maybe multiplying by 8 first. But then again it's more > objects and calculations than are really necessary. > I am using it like this with only two objects for the Duemilanove. Your > version with the table has 59 objects while my duplicated version has 73 > objects for a Duemilanove while needing a lot less calculations, a fraction > of the message transfers and no table lookups or writes. Interesting. How did you quantify the amount of message transfers? What makes it differ so much, like you say? Roman _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
