Would it be feasible to have a log of all pd-ext libraries and their objects, each time a new stable version is released?
Such a list would probably be overwhelming, but at least a good place where to start. M > Having a static table of objects that informs the user what's included in > the > > currently shifting target that is Pd-extended is the wrong approach.? My > > solution would be to delete the entire table, but maybe someone else has > > a better, less drastic idea. > > -- Marco Donnarumma New Media + Sonic Arts Practitioner, Performer, Teacher, Director. ACE, Sound Design MSc by Research (ongoing) The University of Edinburgh, UK ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Portfolio: http://marcodonnarumma.com Research: http://res.marcodonnarumma.com | http://www.thesaddj.com | http://www.flxer.net Director: http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list