Le 22/02/2012 17:51, D G a écrit :
Hi guys

Hey Jonathan your patch was very nice, but the get method did not work for me. I had already tried it before writing to the list. Is there a real way to work this out?

IOhannes

how about: normalize all slider ranges between 0..1 and transform the
output to the desired range only afterwards?
Yes thats what i was trying to avoid. But seems that there is no other way.

i always thought, that the MIDI-based default scaling of sliders and the
like was a step back, and that being able to specify the range has
little gain (though of course i use it...)

That could be if seeking to simplify the settings of native gui objects in PD.

I agree with you on the MIDI based default... normalized could be simpler. Also easier to explain to a person that is just starting to learn PD. Sometimes when they ask "why is the range set to 127" you end up with a long talk about MIDI to a person that is getting started and wants to get his first sound out of PD.

back to the "get"... is there a way to doit?

D


2012/2/22 IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    On 2012-02-21 20:41, D G wrote:
    > Hi List
    > I have been looking but have not found the way to ask a slider
    for the
    > ranges it has been set to.
    >
    > Is there a way to get a slider to print all its propperties?
    This will be
    > useful to create a tool that makes randomness to any slider for a
    > percentage depending on the ranges it is already set to. I
    obviously know
    > the ranges, but have a huge number of sliders and [knob] objects
    so it
    > would be painful to try to get them all.
    > Also, if such a method exists, the randomic thing I wanna do
    could be
    > implemented to any object without having to look at ist propperties.
    >
    > Would appreciate help or leads to workitout.
    >

    how about: normalize all slider ranges between 0..1 and transform the
    output to the desired range only afterwards?

    i always thought, that the MIDI-based default scaling of sliders
    and the
    like was a step back, and that being able to specify the range has
    little gain (though of course i use it...)

    fgm,asdr
    IOhannes
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
    Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

    iEYEARECAAYFAk9EnSYACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvS7GwCgpO45m+ngMiU9EHd3lLb5W7Pb
    FM8AoOQuzXgGVNP+jz+88rUKCfkiPfSz
    =NnuF
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


    _______________________________________________
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list
    UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
    http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->  
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hello,

Here a small patch showing what IOhannes means.
++

Jack


Attachment: rangeSliderNormalized.pd
Description: application/puredata

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to