On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 14:37 +0100, batinste wrote: > Hi > > Rough approach : you could compare your array with the reference array > by playing once from time to time the two simultaneously, sum (the > first) and (the second *-1) and check with env~ that you still get > nothing at the output. > > my 5*10^-7 cents.
Yeah, that's what I meant with comparing them in the audio domain. It'll probably be a bit more efficient than the message domain comparison. I'll have to find out. Thanks for your suggestion. Roman > On 07/03/2012 09:55, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Is there a way to be reliably notified when a table/array changes? My > > hope is that I don't know of some hidden feature. Is there any? > > > > It's easy to catch messages sent to [s arrayname]. However, it's not so > > easy when data is written through [tabwrite arrayname] or [tabwrite~ > > arrayname] or if the data is drawn manually. > > > > My current solution is quite a CPU hog: The whole table is scanned in > > periodic intervals and compared to a reference table, so that any > > difference will be caught. Of course, this solution comes with a latency > > (it's a trade-off between avoiding latency and saving CPU cycles). > > Probably, it could be a wee bit less CPU hungry to make the comparison > > in the audio domain instead of the message domain, but still it's > > work-around. > > > > Is there a real solution for this around? > > > > Roman > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
