On 03/13/2012 07:12 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Though I lack to see the necessity to change [routeOSC]'s current
behaviour, I agree that it most likely wouldn't cause any harm.
As I understand it, this topic only came up because apparently the behaviour
has been changed in the newest release to not allow list-messages containing
OSC-messages as first item anymore, breaking some old patches without any urgent
necessity.
IMHO it's really a user mistake to send [list /what/ever 123( to [routeOSC].
this recent change looks more like a (accidental!) bugfix than a
regression to me (whether it breaks old code or not.. breaking faulty
code should not count, oder? =).
cheers,
y
--
[email protected]
http://yvanvolochine.com
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
